Jesus Is Better Than War The testimony of a former anti-Muslim combat junkie.

Image processed by CodeCarvings Piczard ### FREE Community Edition ### on 2015-05-26 16:37:58Z | |
Image processed by CodeCarvings Piczard ### FREE Community Edition ### on 2015-05-26 16:37:58Z | |

I always knew I would end up in the military. I grew up in a military family, played “war” as a kid, and dreamed of the day I would put on the uniform. That day came in 2003. I was an airborne infantryman in a scout platoon in the 82nd Airborne Division, and my entire identity was wrapped up in being a soldier. The fact that I was getting paid to jump out of airplanes and shoot things blew me away.

In 2005, my unit deployed to Afghanistan, and I was thrilled. I had married the love of my life two months earlier, so it was difficult to leave her, but I wanted to get in the game. We all wanted to deploy; we all wanted to fight. That’s tough for people to understand, I know. The only way I can describe the desire is that it’s like an athlete practicing his entire life and never actually getting to play in the big game.

In 2006, we returned from deployment, and my military career was marching on. I had planned to apply to Special Forces training. I had my entire life mapped out and knew exactly where I was going.

It all came crashing down on January 24, 2006. To make a long story short, parachutes are supposed to open, and mine didn’t. I experienced what is known as a “cigarette roll.” My chute deployed but didn’t open. I pulled my reserve, and it slowed my descent enough so that I didn’t become a permanent lawn dart. But I broke my back while landing, and it became obvious that I would not be able to stay in the military.

The Hardest Year

What came next was the hardest year of my life as well as the hardest year of our marriage. I felt like an empty shell. In the fall of 2006, my former unit deployed to Iraq and experienced heavy casualties. This quickened my downward …

more here:


U.S. Supreme Court to hear Texas state Senate redistricting case

A packed gallery watches as the House of Representatives meets to vote on legislation in Austin, Texas July 9, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Stone
A packed gallery watches as the House of Representatives meets to vote on legislation in Austin, Texas July 9, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Stone

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear a challenge brought by conservatives to Texas state Senate redistricting maps that they say violate the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of “one person-one vote.”

Much much better for everyone:



The challengers, and various conservative groups among them, say the districts signed into law in 2013 do not equally distribute voters because they are based on total population of each district.

Some of the districts include large populations of Hispanic non-citizens who are not eligible to vote.

The districts were initially imposed by court order ahead of the 2012 elections but were later adopted by the Republican-led state legislature and signed into law by Governor Rick Perry, a Republican, in 2013.

The challengers, voters Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger, claim the districts violate the U.S. Constitution guarantee of equal protection under the law because they are at odds with the principle of “one person, one vote.”

Evenwel and Pfenninger are backed by the Project on Fair Representation, a conservative group that has a history of challenging laws that take race into account.

They say that in the districts where they live, which have a high proportion of people eligible to vote, their vote has less weight than it would in districts with a low proportion of potential voters.

The court will hear oral arguments in the case in its next term, which starts in October and ends in June 2016. The case is Evenwel v. Abbot, U.S. Supreme Court, 14-940. (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

Fully nude men committing sex acts on the streets and masturbating in front of babies and school children

By Robert James

(NOTE: The author recommended censoring these images of the Toronto Pride parade, but the editor-in-chief refused citing discrimination against naked wankers. They might start acting all offended if we blacked-out their nasties. This crap is shoved down kid’s throats as “normal”!)


Fully nude men committing sex acts on the streets of Toronto in broad daylight, masturbating in front of babies and school children. According to Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, if you don’t enthusiastically agree with such disturbing almost pedophiliac behaviour – obviously you must be a homophobic bigot. It’s a standard scene every year at the ten day Toronto Pride Orgy, with the full support of Councillor Wong-Tam and the unelected Premier Wynne. Anyone who complains, or even just refuses to attend can expect to be smeared and slandered as a prejudiced hatemonger.


Though somehow Councillor Wong-Tam is fully allowed to despise the Jewish community and use Pride Week to spread her hate speech which is contrary to the City of Toronto’s Anti-Discrimination Policy. I guess the Ontario Human Rights Code can be violated to commit hate speech or abuse free speech based on Councillor Wong-Tam’s prejudices and privileged special interest group’s particular whims. Only a scythe is granted the authority to call the spade a spade.


Kristyn Wong-Tam’s tactic to silence all criticism is not exactly new, her attack dog card has a very old lineage. In an open letter mailed to party members all over the world, the old school Communists laid out their tactics to immobilize all adversaries. Through endless libel and slander “enemies of the people” are fair game for public attacks. Call all opponents terrorists, criminals, villains, vile scum of the earth, fascist defilers. Reinforce endless lies and defamation in the minds of the people, it will quickly become true. Councillor Wong-Tam has learned well the methods of political and cultural assassination from her country of birth. Mao would be proud.


Ward 20 Toronto District School Board Trustee Sam Sotiropoulos quizzed Kristyn Wong-Tam about the criminal code violations freely occurring, and got a personal taste on how the now self-called “LGBTTIQQ2SA” community is bullying straight people. The criminal code clearly states “every one who wilfully does an indecent act in a public place in the presence of one or more persons” and “every person who, in any place, for a sexual purpose, exposes his or her genital organs to a person who is under the age of fourteen years is guilty of an offence”. By simply referencing the law on Kristyn Wong-Tam’s Twitter account, School Trustee Sotiropoulos faced the full fury of queer scorn.


I am not personally homophobic, I could care less what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. It’s their right and not my business… consensual sex is not the government’s business. I do though have a problem when I see oral sex being preformed in the mid-afternoon by two men on the streets beside Osgoode Hall on Canada Day. I also have a problem with how Canada Day celebrations in Toronto are all but cancelled by Pride Week as in 2012, without a Maple Leaf in sight over a distant sea of rainbows. Yet I am among those who are vilified for being an old fashioned bigot by wanting to celebrate my country and not gay “pride” on July 1st. When I asked one city volunteer where the Canada Day events were being held I was told bluntly that Pride Week takes precedence in Toronto.

I also take issue with Kristyn Wong-Tam wanting to use $50,000 in Section 37 condo developer bribes to paint rainbow colours on a crosswalk. I certainly take issue with the estimated $10 million dollar bill to taxpayers for hosting this year’s World Pride event. I am tired of Councillor Wong-Tam’s special interest group “Queers Against Toronto Taxpayers” and her tax dollar funded, subsidized speech that is by no means free. Shielding your children’s eyes from filth? That’s now homophobic too!

The new politically correct term at city hall is “LGBTTIQQ2SA”, they don’t want to offend anyone who self-identifies as “LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, TRANSEXUAL, INTERESTED, QUEER, QUESTIONING,   TWO-SPIRITED or ALLIES.” There is a rare psychiatric mental disorder called Cotard Delusion in which the sufferer self-identifies as being dead. An eccentric belief to be sure, but traditional society is not being forced to bend over backwards and accommodate their inclinations.

People who self-identify as Napoleon don’t get ten days of Psychogenic Amnesia Pride parades, and national holidays are not taken over by droves of naked straight protesters who expect to get a military decoration pinned on their bare chest just for getting laid. Toronto on Canada Day, just as the attempted St. Patrick’s Day seizure in Boston “LGBTTIQQ2SAers” setup their “pride” events to coincide with traditional holidays, destroying cultural values. Since I want to celebrate Canada Day and St. Patrick’s Day on those holidays instead of the forced gay “pride” takeover, I am attacked and called a homophobic bigot. In reality I could care less who or what a person consensually humps in their private free time, just stop forcing it in public.

Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed


1. It Is Not Marriage Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses. The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children. Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

[Get the TFP newsletter for free]

humans exuality
2. It Violates Natural Law  Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law. Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose. Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality. Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)
3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother  It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent. The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will alwa
ys be deprived of either a mother or a father role model. Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.
4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle  In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants. Civil laws are structuring principles of man’s life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior. Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.
alveda1 (1)
5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right  Homosexual activists argue that

same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.  First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected. Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility. Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.
6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families. On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families. Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.
7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State. Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.
8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval. In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants. In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.
9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.” If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations. The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press: “The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality.”
10. It Offends God This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it. Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29) The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7). Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25) Special Request:  Please consider supporting TFP Student Action as a special Guardian of Truth member.  Click here for details. Other resources:

To receive free pro-family updates, subscribe to our newsletter now.

Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. We are not moved by personal hatred against any individual. In intellectually opposing individuals or organizations promoting the homosexual agenda, our only intent is the defense of traditional marriage, the family, and the precious remnants of Christian civilization. As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against unrelenting and violent temptation to homosexual sin. We pray for those who fall into homosexual sin out of human weakness, that God may assist them with His grace. We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weakness and strive to overcome it and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for these too. We pray also for the judges, legislators and government officials who in one way or another take steps that favor homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.” We do not judge their intentions, interior dispositions, or personal motivations. We reject and condemn any violence. We simply exercise our liberty as children of God (Rom. 8:21) and our constitutional rights to free speech and the candid, unapologetic and unashamed public display of our Catholic faith. We oppose arguments with arguments. To the arguments in favor of homosexuality and same-sex “marriage” we respond with arguments based on right reason, natural law and Divine Revelation. In a polemical statement like this, it is possible that one or another formulation may be perceived as excessive or ironic. Such is not our intention. source:

An interfaith service will mark the ninth anniversary of the Plano National Day of Prayer.

Prayer event includes musical diversity

Texan girl praying

The program will include brief prayers offered by clergy from various faith communities and music featuring instruments rarely heard in North Texas.

A youth group will play meditative music using the veena, cymbals, and mridangram, instruments from India. A Persian nay, a bamboo wind instrument similar to the flute, will be featured in a piece played by Enayat Ziaie from the Baha’i Community of Faith.

Sikh devotional prayers will be accompanied by musical instruments known as harmonium, derived from an 18th Century French pump organ, and a pair of drums called tabla or joris. A 300-year-old Indian harp known as a dilruba will also be played.

The program, hosted by the Plano Multicultural Outreach Roundtable, will be held 7-8 p.m. Thursday at Plano Municipal Center, 1520 K Avenue. The event is free and open to the public.

The delinquency of the US Prosecutor Attorney, Ms. Tiffany Eggers

To US Prosecutor Attorney, Ms. Tiffany Eggers:

You are hereby noticed of the following:

1) That Kent Hovind can get a declaratory order from the enacting US
Agency to determine if Kent had a duty in any of the years from
1990-2006 to withhold any taxes for the United States from any church
ministry worker.
2) Kent can also ask if he was authorized to withhold any US taxes
from the same workers.
3) That if it is determined that Kent had no duty or authorization to
withhold taxes for the United States, Kent could not have been
associated with structuring. If no structuring, there would have been
no taking of church property by forfeiture. If no forfeiture, Paul
Hansen would not have been ordered to do anything that could lead to
contempt of court.
4) That all charges should be dropped.
5) That Paul Hansen should be released now.
6) That failure to drop the charges will constitute greater damages.
7) That damages can be determined in all local courts of record, for
all acts were done on land and in court buildings not evidenced as
land owned by the United States of America.

This mailing had been sent to Paul’s attorney, Kent’s attorney,
Tiffany Eggers, and posted on You Tube.

Tiffany Hope Eggers noticed of acting WITHOUT LAW.

~Paul Hansen.


Shawn Stuller Says Gang Members Tried To Attack The Christian Leader Kent Hovind & Other Christians – Guards Didn’t Help

Kent Hovind’s Trusted Friend & Legal Adviser Ernie Land Believes They Are Trying To KILL Him

Urgent Warning (Links Below)

Right before Kent Hovind’s hearings again, just like in March’February, violent gang members are brought into Kent’s dorm that harass and threaten both Kent and all of the members of their daily Bible study group “Kent’s Christian Converts.” Pastor Hovind & others were threatened and their lives were in danger. The Santa Rosa County Jail guards and sheriff apparently were told to “stand down” and sat back and watched as things began to escalate. This is not the first time something like this has happened. Ever since 2006 Kent has been transferred to TWENTY THREE DIFFERENT PRISONS which is known as “Diesel Therapy” to not only teach Kent a lesson but to put his life at risk. See, they only transfer someone that often in hopes of getting them “shanked” because you’re then always the “new guy” and new people get challenged and threatened the most by the prison hierarchy. They’ve also thrown Kent into solitary confinement with violent inmates despite the fact Kent has never broken a prison rule or done anything to warrant it. Unfortunately for the persecutors, Kent kept leading those violent inmates to Jesus and they’d end up joining the Bible Study groups. It was a modern story of “Daniel in the Lion’s Den.”

Urgent Message From Kent Hovind – Goverment Sends “Cyber Bomb” Computer Attacks Against Supporters

Kent Hovind Moved To Solitary Confinement As Punishment For Exposing Corruption – PRAY! (2-10-15)

Kent Hovind’s Cellmate Calls & Confirms His Move To Solitary & Away From Phones (2-11-15)

Mr. Ernie Land Informs Us That Kent Hovind Is No Longer In Solitary Confinement (2-12-15)

Pastor Kent Hovind Still Solitary Confinement To Stop Calls – Trial Starts Tomorrow (3-1-15)

Nicholas Porter Reports on Pastor Kent Hovind’s Isolation & HIs Own Injustice (3-2-15)

Pastor Kent Hovind Moved To Isolation Yet Again (Locked Down 23 Hours A Day)

Prison Confirms Phone Access Cut Of For Kent Hovind While Thrown Into “The Hole” – Persecution

Hooray!! Pastor Hovind is OUT of Isolation!! (March 3,2015)

All Phone Privileges Revoked For Now (Including For Kent Hovind) (4-28-15)

Official Kent Hovind Trial Website

Dr.Kent Hovind’s Teaching Materials & DVDs:…

Live jailhouse Interview With Kent Hovind On The Manning Report (2-6-15)

Thousands Of Testimonies Pour In From Around The World For Persecuted Pastor Kent Hovind!! Wow!

Please Contact Your Congress Representative Or Senator At This Link And Demand They Look Into This IRS Targeting/Corruption Case & Christian Persecution Of An Innocent Man Kent Hovind

20 Shocking Things That Have Happened In the Kent Hovind IRS Targeting & Persecution Case Since 2004 (spread this everywhere!)

Trey Covers Kent Hovind’s Persecution Beginning To Present (4-27-15) – Please Share This Everywhere!

Illegal Imprisonment of Kent Hovind & Other Christians in America | #FreeKent

Kent Hovind vs IRS Structuring | Why Kent Hovind is in Prison (3-22-15)

Creation Science Evangelist Kent Hovind Provides A Summary Of His Entire Case (5-14-15)

Judge Rodgers’ Preposterous Speech Before Kent Hovind Was Sentenced To 10 Years In Prison (2006)

Kent Hovind’s Old Prison Blog and Writings

Social Media:
Nine of Dr.Kent Hovind’s Thirty-Seven E-Books Written From Prison:

To mail a personal letter to Pastor Kent Hovind click on the link below: